Quote:
The answer is yes.
I admire your sense of optimism. Have you actually tried it?
As someone who has tried to smash a vehicle side window using a spiked steel bar* and
bounced off, I can assure you that it's quite possible to fail. (I didn't fail on the second attempt - glass everywhere.)
* Yes, there was a good and legal reason.Quote:
There are no numbers in the game to represent the difference in these two situations.
No, and I don't think there needs to be. That kind of detail is best left to those games with very thick rulebooks and multiple supplements... This kind of difference could easily be left to a GM call (IMO). Let's keep it simple.
Quote:
I reckon a bonus to Attack makes more sense when the GM agrees that the target is neutralised. Say +8 for a human-sized target, more for a bigger one and less for a smaller. Thoughts?
No reason why not but, again, I'd leave it to a GM call. If the target is immobile, helpless and easy to hit; then no problem. But if, as you say, the target is immobile but small, in poor light, &c., &c. then there would be a chance of missing and rolling against ATTACK is appropriate. The GM could assign a bonus (or penalty) as appropriate.